Education2h6 outletscenter averageBlind spot · right

LeftLean leftCenterLean rightRight

Some ratings on this page are entered from the public AllSides ratings and not yet verified against the licensed feed.

Judge allows anonymity for woman in lawsuit against Cornell and fraternity members

What happened

A judge ruled that a woman identified as Jane Doe can remain anonymous in her lawsuit against Cornell University and seven members of the Chi Phi fraternity. The woman alleges she was sexually assaulted at the fraternity house in October 2024. Following the lawsuit, online activity emerged aimed at revealing her identity.

Side by side

Left5 versions

Left outlets focus on online harassment and doxxing attempts, with The New York Times describing how "a movement gained steam online to reveal her identity" and "online right-wingers are doxxing and smearing the accuser." Vox frames the story around institutional prevention measures.

Center1 version

The BBC centers on the woman's legal situation and quotes her lawyer saying she is in "constant fear," presenting the basic facts of the anonymity ruling and assault allegations.

Right2 versions

The New York Post challenges the anonymity protection, stating Jane Doe "willingly courted" "ginned-up publicity" and criticizes "#MeToo's unjust double standards." One article also features a different Stanford case criticizing the "Cornell 7 case."

Bias ratings from AllSides Media Bias Ratings™. Ratings are fluid and change as outlets change. Unbiased links to the source article rather than reproducing it. A few outlets no longer publish a feed and reach us through Google News; their links are marked, and they pass through Google before reaching the outlet.