Some ratings on this page are entered from the public AllSides ratings and not yet verified against the licensed feed.
Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Voter ID Restriction
What happened
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson publicly dissented from a Supreme Court order that allowed New Hampshire to enforce restrictions preventing the use of student IDs as voter identification in the midterm elections. Jackson was the only justice to publicly break with the Court's decision. The ruling came less than two weeks before the midterm elections.
Side by side
No outlet on this side covered it — which is the blind spot above.
Center outlets lead with Jackson's act of dissenting, describing how she "publicly broke with" or "breaks with" the Court. The Hill characterizes the ruling as "allowing New Hampshire to fully block voters from using student IDs."
- HILKetanji Brown Jackson issues public dissent in New Hampshire voting caseThe Hill · Center
- NWKetanji Brown Jackson Breaks With SCOTUS Voting Order as Election LoomsNewsweek · Center
Right outlets emphasize Jackson's separation from the majority, with Breitbart framing it as Jackson "Breaks with SCOTUS" and Fox describing her as "again publicly breaks with Supreme Court." Fox characterizes the case as "justices side with GOP" in the headline.
- BRTJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson Breaks with SCOTUS in New Hampshire Voter ID FightBreitbart News · Right
- FOXJackson again publicly breaks with Supreme Court as justices side with GOP in last-minute voter ID fightFox News Digital · Right
Bias ratings from AllSides Media Bias Ratings™. Ratings are fluid and change as outlets change. Unbiased links to the source article rather than reproducing it. A few outlets no longer publish a feed and reach us through Google News; their links are marked, and they pass through Google before reaching the outlet.