Justice21h13 outletscenter average

LeftLean leftCenterLean rightRight

Some ratings on this page are entered from the public AllSides ratings and not yet verified against the licensed feed.

Justice Kagan Says Supreme Court Rulings Have Weakened Democracy and Increased Polarization

What happened

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan spoke at Catholic University on Tuesday, two weeks before the midterm elections, criticizing recent Supreme Court decisions. She argued that rulings on gerrymandering, campaign finance, and voting rights have weakened American democracy and increased political polarization. Kagan specifically addressed decisions that weakened the Voting Rights Act and allowed more partisan gerrymandering.

Side by side

Left7 versions

Left outlets emphasize the conservative majority's "antidemocratic actions" and frame Kagan as warning or reminding Americans about threats to democracy. HuffPost and MS NOW use language like "undermining democracy" and "antidemocratic" prominently in their framing.

Center3 versions

Center outlets focus on Kagan's critique of specific rulings without emphasizing partisan framing. The Hill and Reuters describe her comments as criticism that rulings "heightened political polarization" or have been "destructive to democracy" without leading with the conservative-liberal divide.

Right4 versions

Right outlets frame the story around Kagan's partisanship or internal conflict. RealClearPolitics leads with "Justice Kagan's Partisanship Problem" and accuses her of favoring Democratic gerrymandering. Fox News emphasizes she "turns on her own court" and is making a "dire warning."

Bias ratings from AllSides Media Bias Ratings™. Ratings are fluid and change as outlets change. Unbiased links to the source article rather than reproducing it. A few outlets no longer publish a feed and reach us through Google News; their links are marked, and they pass through Google before reaching the outlet.